Yesterday, beloved WWE wrestler John Cena took to Twitter and tweeted the following…
It seems more people are against this than in favor of it. I think it certainly can be a tremendous thing for WWE if everything is done right. If they fuck up and do what WCW did, then it’s obviously not going to work. The two greatest things about Raw going three hours is it will be good for up and coming talent, and storylines can develop better with the extra hour. Jordan will be giving her thoughts but she will be focusing on the ‘cons’ side of things.
The Pros
– Good to feature up and coming talent
As we’re reading and discussing the announcement online, it could be a good thing for us especially that Raw will be going 3 hours. We should get to see more of the up and coming stars. Talent like R-Truth, The Miz, Zack Ryder, The USO’s, Kofi Kingston, and the best god damn jobber in the business Dolph Ziggler. We will hopefully see them wrestle more, talk more and watch them develop into big stars. That’s what we want as wrestling fans, seeing young stars rise to main event level. After all, they are the stars who will carry the company for years to come. I think if WWE were more patient with building their stars, we would be watching a better product.
– Storylines can develop better
With an extra hour of Monday Night Raw, stories have more time to develop. WWE have a Pay-Per-View every month, with roughly five hours of Raw programming excluding the commercials. Now they will have around eight hours of Raw programming before going into a Pay-Per-View. With more time, you’re more eager to watch the match it has all been building up for. Look at it like this, Rock vs. Cena with a years build would be a lot better than three months build. Just using that as an example, may not be the best one though. Or imagine how Brock and Cena would of been if they spaced out all those promos/interviews/flashbacks at us. They could open the show with one and end with the two or just one of them at the end. You have the best part of two hours to work with and focus on the other talent. For some reason, I have no interest in any of the matches at Over The Limit apart from CM Punk vs. Daniel Bryan. That is because the stories have not caught my interest. With better build and more time, that extra hour could make the difference in me buying it instead of not.
The Cons
-Worked Great for WCW In January of 1998, WCW Nitro became a three hour broadcast. Many people consider 1998 the year that WCW began to die. The shows became lackluster, and the fans tuned out, one reason being over-saturation of the product (read further) Less than a year later, RAW took over the ratings war.
-Over-Saturation I love pizza, I really do. Does that mean I want to eat pizza every night of the week, though? Of course not; I’d get sick of it, and you would too. You eat too much of something you’re going to get sick of it, the same is true when it comes to watching wrestling (or any show). It’s called over-saturation. Now think about this, next year, this could all be programming WWE wants you to watch from week to week: 3 hrs of RAW, 2 hrs. of Smackdown, 1 hr. of Superstars, 1 hr of NXT, 1 hr of Tough Enough (if it’s ever brought back), a 1 hr. Countdown show, the several different YouTube shows, and then there’s 13 ppv events, so that’s, let me count….37 hrs, and when you’re not watching the current programs, they want you to be glued to your television screen, watching the WWE Network. Don’t forget to buy the dvds!
I love wrestling more than anything, but I’m sorry, there is no way I’m investing this much time into watching something that has stunk for the past six years. Clearly, thousands of other fans are in the same boat, as the ratings for Smackdown dwindle.
-Fan Interaction One of the key points WWE executives made clear in the press release regarding this change, is more fan interaction. Apparently, fans are going to be able to vote on matches they want to see. To anyone who thinks this is smart, I have three words for you: Viewer’s Choice RAW. This was a three hour episode that featured such classics, like a Dance-Off between Santino and Vladimir Kozlov, the Big Show and Chris Jericho pitted against one another in a Bodyslam match, Edge vs. Randy Orton in a “One Arm Tied Behind the Back” match, and The Hart Dynasty going up against The Great Khali and Hornswoggle.
Of course, there’s always speculation that WWE riggs and/or alters the voting in same way. Honestly, though, I do not give two flying frog splashes about random matches voted on by the fans. I want to see storylines created, stars developed, and matches that serve purposes.
#RyderRevolution says “hi” by the way.
-When was the last good 3 Hr. show, anyway? Anyone? Seriously, most WWE three hour specials are horrible, with the majority composing of filler and ridiculously unfunny, downright insulting to your intelligence, comedy skits.
–Current Ratings Trend Over the past year, RAW has been subject to a bad trend. No, I’m not talking about “Anal Bleeding” trending on Twitter, but rather, the shows hourly ratings. The second hour of the show has consistently drawn a poorer rating than the first. Which means, viewers are tuning out as the show goes on. So, how in the World does WWE expect to keep viewers engaged for three hours, if they can’t even manage two? The additional hour also has a nasty habit of decreasing the average show rating, granted, this is due to fans forgetting to tune at an earlier time.
-Current Product Draught Speaking of the last six years, yeah, they’ve been bad, and there’s no sign of things improving. “But J, The Rock and Brock are back”- Cool, now let me know when the company invests in some good midcard talent, creates a tag team division, fixes the Diva’s division, and hires a creative team. Obviously, the biggest argument for this added hour, is the hope that it will lend way to more talent being featured, in more matches, and better storylines. Let me tell ya something; if they wanted to feature more talent, they would, and if they wanted to have more matches, they could. And honestly, I have no clue where some of you people got the idea that an extra hour will mean better storylines. I mean, for one, you have to have storylines before you can develop them. Secondly, the creative team has to you know, be creative, and Vince has to approve those good ideas and not change his mind dozens of times, up until showtime.
RAW has been a two hour program for nearly it’s entire existence, and they seem to have managed just fine. They didn’t need three hours to make Bret Hart a star, to make Shawn Michaels a star, to make Steve Austin, The Rock, Triple H, Kurt Angle, Brock Lesnar, John Cena, and countless others, stars.
Take everything you dislike about RAW currently, and add another whole hour of it. Another hour for recaps. Another hour for horrendous WWE Studio’s movie ads. Another hour of listening to a horrible commentary team, stumble through the broadcast. Another hour for boring matches. Another hour for plothole filled “storylines”. Another hour….well, I think you get the point, unless you want me to go on for another hour. Below is what our followers on Twitter thought of Raw going three hours!
@bakerthepatrick – PROS: Could have longer matches, showcase guys better. CONS: Just get loads more filler so #Raw will still be shite.
@el_swiftelero – WWE barely has enough to keep 2 hrs entertaining. No idea what they’re gonna do to make 3 hrs every wk. More @CMPunk time?
@21Maxwell – Positive, if it allows more time for the under card and their character development.
@Mental_EMP It’s risky. It can work, although it probably won’t.
@tajealthea – I think the 3 hour #Raw show will be AWESOME
@NatLovesCena – I think its gonna be interesting in terms of quality and ratings wondering how they gonna manage to keep that up
@TremainesAngelx – AMAZING! I hope this means more wrestling, great angles and a better chance for the midcarders to perform.
@mistyreneepeet – I think it would be awesome.
@JX2001 – Well the upside is that half the show won’t be wasted on promos anymore
@JayeshGASatsfan – It’s a good idea to see an extra hour of Raw but i’m not sure if it will work or not
@scottlufc19 – pro chance to showcase more talent, con more john cena @JakeRobbins9 – I reckon it will be great for storylines but there might be more filler matches
@Tembo4Real – Theres never enuff wrestling so hell yeah! gimme more! lol
@helenrobinson82 – Awesome, but Tuesday’s just got a whole lot tougher!
@WhataManeuver – I think at the moment there struggling to fill 2hours with an entertaining story, so I would bring up some more FCW stars.
@DAZTOM91 – I think the #3HourRaw could potentially be a bad idea. No doubt they will just fill the extra hour with crap. Hope not.
_______________________________________
Thanks for reading. Make sure you follow @J712v2 @RayTheRambler and @WrestlinRambles on Twitter. Laying The Smackdown coming tomorrow, Insight Into Impact coming Sunday so make sure you visit back. We’d love to know the thoughts of those of you who tweeted us, even if you didn’t, still give your thoughts on the situation. You don’t need an account nor an email address to comment, you can simply pick a name, log in using Twitter or Facebook account. Hope to see you rambling 😀
This is the beginning of the end………of Smackdown.
LikeLike
You could be 100% correct or wrong. There’s reasons why it could benefit SD too.
LikeLike
I wonder if this could be a chance for more Iron Man-style matches. They would have more time to do so. Hart/HBK, Brock/Angle, and HBK/Cena(that one was a pure shock) were all quite good.
Here’s how I would do it:
1st hour(or close to it): Focus on tag team and younger stars. Begin transition to mid-card/upper-card with about ten minutes left .
2nd hour: Focus on mid to upper-card and set up for the final hour. Focus on Divas. Show the after effects of the first hour(in locker room).
3rd hour: Show after effects of second hour(in locker room). Focus on the upper-mid to main event stars. Spotlight storylines that involve the whole company, not just a feud. Build up to a climax.
LikeLike
That would certainly be interesting Capt. But the ratings probably wouldn’t be good if they don’t open with established starpower, it could turn people off from watching the rest of the show.
But Raw needs to be organised better as you basically said.
LikeLike
Thought I mentioned starting every hour with some star power. Oops.
Honestly, I don’t think it would matter with the rating. Today, people switch back and forth between shows.
LikeLike
I tend to agree more with J, based on WCW’s history of a permanent 3 hour broadcast and WWE’s history of their 3 hour shows.
I’ve said this before. It’s more than just WWE doing their job to develop talent. It’s also the talent’s responsibility to develop themselves. If they don’t like something about their storyline, character, whatever, they need to step and say something about it. They need to bring up solutions on how to make their character better. Jericho, Austin, Rock, Roberts, Foley, HHH, HBK, etc. are prime examples of that.
LikeLike
The problem with the talent bringing a push up or anything is it can only help so much. It’s not what you know, but who you know.
LikeLike
And also they seem to care more about making money than enhancing their careers.
LikeLike
Well, considering WWE doesn’t give them insurance, I can’t really blame them for wanting more money.
LikeLike
lol, there is more reasons why it could fail but I think if they start off right it can overpower the cons. Just IMO.
Jeremy, the talent is there. The problem is they have guys like ADR, who they just throw into the main event scene on his debut. ADR is a great character, he’s getting boring now because we arguably seen the best of him. He wasn’t built properly, he has the potential, just not booked right.
LikeLike
The sad part is Del Rio can bring it in the ring. He speaks like an earnest face, not a heel. Should’ve debuted as a face.
LikeLike
And I want Pizza now! 🙂
LikeLike
My job here is done.
LikeLike
Do you deliver?
When I get rich, I’m gonna open a Chinese/Pizza beffet.
LikeLike
If this means more WRESTLING I’m all for it and will put my chips on the table.
3 hour Raws have always been a comical affair which have been based on extended entertainment and features. If raw is expected to be 3hours every week, hopefully WWE will adopt a strategy that spaces out the entertInment and wrestling. Thus making it an exciting feature for fans.
But yes, as above, the likelyhood is that more stars will appear on raw and that it will dilute smackdown brand.
LikeLike
Smackdown will become 2 hours of thumb-wrestling.
LikeLike
Well if WWE do this right, it could be the best thing they ever did.
I’m just hoping to god the cons don’t overpower the pros.
LikeLike
The Cons overpowering The Pros….you make it sound like a Traditional Survivor Series match.
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
You also made me look bad when you knew I was asleep, lol!
LikeLike
How would he know you were asleep?
LikeLike
HEY! Don’t diss the Viewers Choice Raw, I loved that Hart Dynasty vs Khali/Hornswoggle match!! 😛
I hope it’s a chance to see certain talents utilised better, and appearing on Raw more often. They’ve got no excuse now, there’s extra time each week, matches can go a bit longer than usual, allowing talent to shine more.
Although, I bet the Divas matches still last 2-3 minutes. 😉
LikeLike
lmao… I don’t like that idea at all tbh. It’ll get boring quick IMO.
Who knows, they might get 5 minutes! haha
LikeLike
This is a complete ripoff of TJR from the pro/cons to the Twitter reactions.
http://tjrwrestling.com/articles/tjr-the-pros-cons-of-three-hour-wwe-monday-night-raw
LikeLike
Proof it’s not a ripoff: https://mobile.twitter.com/J712v2/status/203601754154217472
Many sites are doing like-columns, and of course pros/cons will be the same.
LikeLike
Yeah, it’s the IWC. They have to go nuts.
LikeLike
lol…every site is doing pros and cons. In fact, I was going to post just the pros, but since it was a little short, I tweeted to WR twitter followers what they though, it’s a good interaction tool and it got a good enough response, I think I’ll do more of them. Then J added in the cons since she is a more of a critic than me 😛
LikeLike
@Capt – J is a girl 😛 lol
And because I tweeted it to her.
LikeLike
Oh, I guess I missed the “S”. My keyboard has been acting funny recently. Might need a new one.
Sorry, J. 😦
LikeLike
As a detective, I find that sentence ”fishy”, lol joke 😛
LikeLike
*rimshot*
LikeLike
It’s cool, I’ve been a dude since ’09 (when I officially joined the IWC, not something else lol).
LikeLike
I became a dude back in 1979. Welcome to the club! We have great benefits and people don’t mind if you scratch your butt in public.
Again, sorry. Don’t hit me.
LikeLike
I really think this was a bad decision,I mean, on the normal shows the rating drops about half way, mostly because either they get bored or the content doesnt interest them.
If they have a 2 hour show, with interesting content, good matches, and makes you wanna follow up next week, they will sell tickets.
But if they make a 3 hour raw, WITHOUT interesting content, and WITHOUT good matches, people will get bored.
I mean, if they cant have enough interesting content for 2 hours, what the hell makes them think that they will entertain us for 3 hours!
I hope i am wrong, but I think this is going to be a MAJOR fail.
LikeLike
This could very well the way it’ll lead to, I’m hoping with the extra hour they can focus on building their stories better. And I really want to see them push their mid card a helluva lot better than now, they have to really.
LikeLike
Ratings will drop no matter what. People have a playlist mentality. They only want to watch what they want to watch, instead of staying around for the whole show.
LikeLike
I forgot to mention the good part 🙂
Maybe with a 3 hour show, small tallents will have the opportunity to rise, but they probably wont.
LikeLike
It depends on whether they take a certain pill.
LikeLike
Listen to The Top Rope podcast at the top of the page, they said nice words about this column 😀
LikeLike